AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY | Greater Disclosure of Material Corporate Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Data at AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
AXP
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Financials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that American Express Company(American Express) report to shareholders on the effectiveness of the Company’s diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. The reporting should be done at reasonable expense, exclude proprietary information, and address outcomes, using quantitative metrics for recruitment, retention, and promotion of employees, including data by gender, race, and ethnicity
Whereas clause
Numerous studies by respected organizations such as The Wall Street Journal, Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, and McKinsey have pointed to the material benefits of a diverse workforce. Companies should look to hire the best talent. However, Black and Latino applicants face recruitment challenges. Results of a meta-analysis study of 24 field experiments, dating back to 1990, found that, with identical resumes, White applicants receive an average of 36 percent more callbacks than Black applicants and 24 percent more callbacks than Latino applicants. Promotion rates show how well diverse talent is nurtured at a company. Unfortunately, women and non-White employees experience a broken rung in their careers. For every 100 men who are promoted, only 86 women are promoted. Non-White women are particularly impacted, comprising 17 percent of the entry-level workforce and only 4 percent of executives. Employees with the potential for advancement have a higher retention rate. Morgan Stanley found that [e]mployee retention that is above industry peer averages can indicate the presence of competitive advantage. This advantage may lead to higher levels of future profitability than past financial performance would indicate. Companies with high employee satisfaction have been linked to annualized outperformance of over two percent. American Express has stated: To ensure more balanced representation at all levels of the company, American Express has a comprehensive strategy that encompasses recruitment, hiring and promotion practices to attract, develop and retain underrepresented colleagues. However, American Express has been unwilling to share sufficient recruitment, retention, and promotion data to allow investors to determine the effectiveness of its human capital management programs. Between September 2020 and September 2021, the number of S&P 100 companies releasing recruitment rate data by gender, race and ethnicity increased by 234 percent, companies releasing retention rate data increased by 79 percent, and companies releasing promotion rate data increased by 379 percent. Allstate, BlackRock, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase, MetLife, Progressive, and State Street, among others, all release more data on the effectiveness of their human capital management programs than American Express does. Visa has committed to release the entirety of the requested data set. A shareholder resolution with a similar request was voted on by American Express shareholders on May 4, 2021. It received support from 60 percent of investors. As of October, 2021, American Express has not yet increased its reporting of workforce inclusion data.
Supporting statement
Quantitative data is sought so that investors can assess, understand, and compare the effectiveness of companies’ diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and apply this analysis to investors’ portfolio management and securities’ selection process.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.