Dominion Energy (Dominion Energy Resources, Inc.) | Political Contributions Misalignment - Racial Justice at Dominion Energy

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
NYSE: D
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Lobbying / political engagement
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Utilities
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board of Directors conduct an evaluation and issue a report within the next year (at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information) describing if and how Dominion Energy, Inc.’s political activities (direct and through trade associations) align with the Company’s stated commitment to social justice and racial equality. The report should also address the risks presented by any misalignment and the company’s plans, if any, to mitigate these risks.
Supporting statement
Dominion Energy, Inc.’s political activities may exacerbate existing systemic racial inequities. Financial, reputational, and legal risks related to the Company’s political activities could also adversely affect shareholder value. Despite Dominion Energy’s commitment to addressing racial inequality, the Company was found to be one of the top corporate contributors to lawmakers supporting voter suppression bills (https://bit.ly/3bpL5dv). These bills disproportionately disenfranchise Black, Indigenous and People of Color Americans (https://nyti.ms/3BrqWyr). The Company was also one of the top contributors to the RSLC, which in the run up to the 2020 elections focused on its right lines campaign, zeroing in on redistricting efforts. These efforts have been deemed by Mother Jones Magazine the major driving force behind political resegregation. (https://bit.ly/328fhZj) According to the Center for Political Accountability, gerrymandering undertaken by these organizations was racially driven, diluting Black and Brown voters’ power at the ballot box. (https://bit.ly/30EIomA) As the Financial Times notes, the gerrymandering or redrawing of voting maps has supported the systemic economic oppression of African Americans. (https://on.ft. com/3x3zquX) Corporate political activity that is inconsistent with racial equity poses a systemic risk to economic stability and introduces uncertainty and volatility into investment portfolios. As a recent Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions study found, closing racial gaps is a pareto improvement to both the U.S. economy and society. If racial gaps had been closed 20 years ago, U.S. GDP could have benefited by an estimated $16 trillion (http://citi. us/3gNyDWS). Misalignment poses potential financial risks. According to Public Citizen, Dominion is one of the top corporate contributors to politicians supporting voter suppression bills in Virginia. (https://bit.ly/3kLcRGJ). Several major corporations have already faced boycotts for failing to strongly oppose voter suppression bills. Political activity that contributes to the further restriction and criminalization of voting access contributes to economic instability. It has been shown that voting access has a direct impact on social and economic racial gaps with greater voting access correlated to improvements in a variety of economic factors. By aligning its political activity with its stated commitment to social justice and equality and its support for efforts intended to address the fundamental causes of systemic racism, including voter suppression, Dominion Energy can mitigate risk and contribute positively to long-term shareholder value.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.