Five Below | Sustainable Accounting on Chemicals Policy

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
FIVE
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Conduct due diligence, audit or risk/impact assessment
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Waste and pollution
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that the Board of Directors issue a report to shareholders with a Discussion of processes to assess and manage risks and/or hazards associated with chemicals in products, with consideration of the SASB multiline and specialty retailers standard. The report should be published within one year of the 2022 Annual Meeting, at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information.
Whereas clause
For investors, consumer exposure to hazardous chemicals in products raises company specific and portfolio-wide concerns. In the last decade, poor management of regulatory, legal, reputation and redesign risks from hazardous chemicals in products has caused plummeting company stock prices (Bayer, Lumber Liquidators, 3M, Dow) and bankruptcy (SIGG NA, J&J). Across the economy, the costs are rising: a 2017 study showed that costs associated with environmental chemical exposures worldwide likely exceed 10 percent of global GDP or 11 trillion dollars.1 Independent tests showed that 66% of 35 products randomly selected for testing from Five Below stores contained chemicals of high concern, like lead2 . Regulatory risk is on the rise. Since 2000, more than 35 states have passed 173 policies that establish state chemicals programs to identify, limit or ban the use of harmful chemicals in products including baby bottles, furniture, electronics, toys, cosmetics and cleaning products.3 The Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) has established industry-specific Standards that guide companies in disclosing financially material, decision-useful sustainability information for investors. Within the consumer goods sector, SASB established standards associated with multiline and specialty retailers and distributors (applicable to our Company). One of these SASB guidelines relates to processes to assess and manage risks and/or hazards associated with chemicals in products. Five Below does not report to investors on numerous elements that SASB recommends regarding chemical hazards in products including: • Operational processes it employs for chemicals management. • Whether it uses testing and/or third party certification to verify chemical content of private and third party labeled products. • Progress toward the elimination goals. The Chemical Footprint Project (CFP) Survey4 benchmarks corporate reduction of the use of chemicals of high concern. The CFP identified over 2,200 chemicals defined by authoritative bodies known to be harmful to human health and environment, drawing from lists including EPA’s carcinogens and persistent bioaccumulative toxins lists and the National Institutes of Health Reproductive and Developmental toxins list. Walmart, Target, and Dollar Tree participate in the CFP survey and have set public goals to address their chemical footprints.
Supporting statement
The proponent recommends that the report also be prepared with an eye toward organized efforts such as the Chemical Footprint Project Survey and its use of authoritative sources for candidates for company restricted substances lists, and that the report, at board and management discretion, consider the relative benefits and drawbacks of: • Developing a comprehensive chemical policy; • Identifying chemicals of high concern and a process for their elimination; and • Deployment of safer alternatives when available.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.