COMCAST CORPORATION | Report on risks of omitting “viewpoint” and “ideology” from EEO policy at COMCAST CORPORATION

Status
1.44% votes in favour
AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
CMCSA
Resolution ask
Conduct due diligence, audit or risk/impact assessment
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
National Center for Public Policy has filed the following resolution. This will be updated in the lead filer field as soon as possible.

Shareholders request that Comcast Corporation (“Comcast”) issue a public report detailing the potential risks associated with omitting “viewpoint” and “ideology” from its written equal employment opportunity (EEO) policy. The report should be available within a reasonable timeframe, prepared at a reasonable expense and omit proprietary information.
Supporting statement
Comcast does not explicitly prohibit discrimination based on viewpoint or ideology in its written EEO policy.

Comcast’s lack of a company-wide best practice EEO policy sends mixed signals to company employees and prospective employees and calls into question the extent to which individuals are protected due to inconsistent state policies and the absence of federal protection for partisan activities. Approximately half of Americans live and work in a jurisdiction with no legal protections if their employer takes action against them for their political activities or discriminates on the basis of viewpoint in the workplace.

Companies with inclusive policies are better able to recruit the most talented employees from a broad labor pool, resolve complaints internally to avoid costly litigation or reputational damage, and minimize employee turnover. Moreover, inclusive policies contribute to more efficient human capital management by eliminating the need to maintain different policies in different locations.

There is ample evidence that individuals with conservative viewpoints may face discrimination at Comcast.

Comcast’s most outward-facing properties are the NBC network, including its news channels and sites. These are substantially biased against center/right thought in ways that both suggest that the bias stretches backward through the Company and also in ways that cause it to offend potential customers,(1) fall away from best practices in the industry,(2) endanger employees,(3) risk litigation and other needless expenses,(4) and otherwise pose financial and reputational risks. All of these risks could be diminished or avoided altogether if the Company were to provide protections against viewpoint discrimination that allowed employees of diverse viewpoints to warn the Company of the risks associated with ideologically blinkered behaviors.

Presently, shareholders are unable to evaluate how Comcast prevents discrimination towards employees based on their ideology or viewpoint, mitigates employee concerns of potential discrimination, and ensures a respectful and supportive work atmosphere that bolsters employee performance.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.