ALIMENTATION COUCHE-TARD INC. | Business protection from takeover at ALIMENTATION COUCHE-TARD INC.

Status
6.70% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
4
Resolution details
Company ticker
ATD.B
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Other
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Staples
Company HQ country
Canada
Resolved clause
It is proposed that Couche-Tard put in place the necessary means to prevent a takeover of the company, either hostile or not.
Supporting statement
The possible means of preventing the takeover of a company are numerous and the question of the protection of head offices was the subject of a State report to which it is appropriate to refer5 . The company's Multiple Voting Share (MVS) plan was abolished in the past year. The company no longer has the protections and guarantees provided by this plan. Couche-Tard, given its many qualities—starting with its size and the important place it occupies not only in the country, but also throughout the world—is a target of choice for a potential buyer. In the absence of having been able to protect the control of the founders, it is important today to protect the head office, if only to ensure the sustainability of its contribution to the national community which saw its birth and in ensure outreach abroad. It is a corporate social responsibility.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.