American Tower Corporation | Report on GHG targets and transition plan at American Tower Corporation

Status
Omitted
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
AMT
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Real Estate
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request American Tower, by November 1, 2023, issue near and long-term science-based GHG reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s ambition of maintaining global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius and summarize plans to achieve them. The targets should cover the company’s full range of operational and supply chain emissions.
Whereas clause
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has advised that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050 in order to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius and avoid the worst impacts of climate change. Every incremental increase in temperature above 1.5 degrees will entail increasingly severe physical, transition, and systemic risks for companies and investors alike.

As American Tower Corporation (“American Tower” or “the Company”) noted in its 2022 10-K, climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of natural disasters, which may disrupt the operations of the Company’s towers, fiber networks, data centers, and computer systems. American Tower also operates in numerous countries and U.S. states where climate regulations are in effect or under consideration, and the Company’s recent acquisitions of energy-intensive data centers make long-term preparations to comply with such regulation critical. American Tower’s climate risk mitigation strategy falls short of investor expectations. Although the Company has set a near-term GHG target, it is not aligned with limiting warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. American Tower also has not set a long-term science-based GHG target inclusive of its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions. By contrast, competitor Cellnex Telecom has a near-term 1.5 degree-aligned target approved by the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and has committed to achieve climate neutrality by 2050.

American Tower must take additional action to comprehensively address its climate impact and mitigate both the physical risks to its operations and the transition risks associated with new regulation and a global shift to a clean energy economy. Proponents believe adopting 1.5 degree Celsius-aligned science-based targets for its full carbon footprint will help the Company mitigate these risks.
Supporting statement
In assessing targets, we recommend, at management’s discretion:
• Consideration of approaches used by advisory groups like SBTi;
• Developing a transition plan that shows how the company plans to meet its goals, taking into consideration criteria used by advisory groups and investors like CDP, CA100+, and SSGA; and
• Consideration of supporting targets for renewable energy, energy efficiency, low-carbon steel, and other measures deemed appropriate by management.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.