Equinor ASA | Stop oil drilling and exploration & support rebuild of Ukraine at Equinor ASA

Status
0.31% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
10
Resolution details
Company ticker
EQNR (previously Statoil)
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Other ask
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Climate change
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
Norway
Resolved clause
Shareholder Guttorm Grundt has proposed the following resolution: “1. Equinor introduces full stop of all exploration drilling for fossil energy resources on the Norwegian continental shelf and abroad by 2025 2. Equinor will provide financial and technical assistance for the repair and development of Ukraine’s energy infrastructure with emphasis on energy security and renewable energy worth an average of NOK 15 billion per year in the period 2023-2027
Supporting statement
The shareholder’s supporting statement:
Equinor has never made more money than in 2022. Thanks to the high natural gas prices Equinor makes
more money than any other Norwegian company in history. Adjusted earnings after tax totaled as much
as NOK 234 billion, and approximately NOK 170 billion of this goes to shareholders, and just over NOK 1
billion in bonuses to a majority of the employees. Parts of the profit are allocated to an increase in new
investments in both fossil and renewable energy, but mostly to oil and gas.
The record earnings are not a result of extraordinary efforts by the management and employees, but are
driven by artificially high natural gas prices due to the energy crisis in Europe as a consequence of Russia’s
belligerent invasion of Ukraine. Equinor makes good money from this war, but I would not characterize our
Equinor as a war profiteer, as some critics do. But the extraordinarily high revenues can give you certain
associations to war profiteering.
In his presentation of the IPCC’s sixth and gloomy Synthesis Report, United Nations Secretary-General
Antonio Guterres said that ”Humanity is on thin ice, and that ice is melting fast.” He calls on rich countries
to accelerate the goal of zero emissions. ”Our world needs climate action on all fronts – everything,
everywhere, all at once, and he added: ”To reach the net zero emissions targets we must stop all oil and gas
exploration and new projects.” He made no exception for Equinor.
The World Bank has estimated that the reconstruction of buildings and infrastructure destroyed by Russian
warfare will cost about USD 411 billion, or about NOK 4,300 billion over the next few years. The Norwegian
government has promised Ukraine to pay NOK 75 billion over the next 5 years, i.e. 17 per thousand of the
need, or a little more than a drop in the ocean. That is, 15 billion per year.
As shareholders we are now facing a serious ethical dilemma: Should Equinor let the entire profit created
by the Ukraine war go to the acquisition of its own shares and to dividends to shareholders, etc., or should
the company let a small, but important, part go to rebuilding Ukraine’s destroyed energy infrastructure and
new renewable energy? By ”matching” the government’s support of NOK 15 billion per year, the dividend this
year, for example, will only be reduced from NOK 170 billion to NOK 155 billion. It’s more than a drop in the
ocean, but still one of the fattest dividends in Equinor’s history.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.