Equinor ASA | Improved process to respond to shareholder proposals at Equinor ASA

Status
0.20% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
11
Resolution details
Company ticker
EQNR (previously Statoil)
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Strengthen board oversight of issue
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Shareholder rights
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
Norway
Resolved clause
“The Board of Directors and Group Management shall develop a procedure for a greatly improved process for responding to shareholder proposals submitted at the Annual General Meeting.”
Supporting statement
Why don’t the governments and Equinor listen to proposals from Norwegian shareholders? For many years, Norwegian shareholders have submitted proposals or resolutions for approval by the annual shareholders meeting (AGM), related to international oil and gas exploration, drilling and production, the environment and energy transition. These proposals have been consistently voted down by the representative from the Ministry of Trade and Industry, who represent the State’s 67% ownership in Equinor. The vote is based on meetings with Equinor’s Board of Directors and Group Management before the annual general meeting. It later emerged that in many cases, Equinor had later carried out what was proposed. An earlier action would have saved Equinor and the Norwegian state large sums of money. Here are some examples: Proposal: Statoil (Equinor) to divest its tar sands activity in Canada. Proposal from 2009: Not accepted by the Government’s representative based on recommendation by Statoil’s (Equinor’s) board of directors. The proposal was repeated in 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2016, each time voted down by the Government’s representative. Statoil sold its tar sands operations in Canada in December 2016 with a loss of more than NOK 4.2 billion. Proposal: Statoil (Equinor) to develop an energy transition plan. Proposal from 2015: Not accepted by the Government’s representative based on the recommendation of Statoil’s (Equinor’s) board of directors. The proposal was repeated in 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021. In March 2022, Equinor presented their ”Energy transition plan”. Proposal: Equinor will stop drilling in the waters south of Australia. Proposal from 2019: Not accepted by the Government’s representative based on the recommendation of Equinor’s board of directors. In February 2020, Equinor pulled out of the area. Proposal: Equinor to pull out of US onshore oil and gas activities (fracking). Proposal from 2020: Not accepted by the Government’s representative based on the recommendation of Equinor’s board of directors. In February 2021, Equinor pulled out of onshore activities and reported financial losses of NOK 200 billion, with no consequences for members of the board of directors or the corporate executive committee.
And the story repeats itself: In the 2022 AGM, these were, among several proposals, voted down by the Government’s representative: - Proposal from shareholders that Equinor introduce a climate target and emissions plan in line with the 1.5°C target. - Proposals from shareholders that Equinor declare the Norwegian sector of the Barents Sea as a voluntary exclusion zone and prioritize its offshore activities in the Norwegian sector and rapidly increase its investments in renewable energy. - Proposal from the shareholder that Equinor’s board of directors develop a concrete action plan for quality assurance and anti-corruption.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.