Google Inc. (Alphabet Inc.) | Report on assessing systemic climate risk from retirement plan options at Google Inc. (Alphabet Inc.)

AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Climate change
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Company sector
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request Alphabet publish a report disclosing how the Company is protecting plan beneficiaries — especially those with a longer investment time horizon — from increased future portfolio risk created by present-day investments in high-carbon companies.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: Without aggressive mitigation, climate change will have significant, deleterious consequences for the global economy, with some estimates suggesting that unmitigated climate change can be expected to shave 11 to 14 percent off global economic output by 2050 unless average global temperature increase is kept to less than two degrees Celsius.[1]

These effects will have a particularly significant impact on workers saving for retirement. Retirement plan beneficiaries have long investment horizons, and “[t]he longer term the investment horizon, the more likely it is that climate will not only be a material risk, but the most material risk.”[2] Climate portfolio risk to retirement plans will be difficult to mitigate. An International Finance Corporation report concluded that “the traditional way of managing risk through a shift in asset allocation into increased holdings of more conservative, lower risk, lower return, asset classes may do little to offset climate risks.”[3]

While our Company has taken actions to address its operational greenhouse gas emissions,[4] it has not acted to meaningfully address the emissions generated by its retirement plan investments. The plan’s “default” investment option — into which participants are automatically enrolled if they do not affirmatively select another option — is the Vanguard Target Retirement fund series. The funds in this series account for 65% of plan assets.[5] These funds invest heavily in high-carbon companies and companies contributing to deforestation.[6]

Investments in high-carbon and deforestation-risk companies help fuel the climate crisis and make worst-case economic scenarios more likely.[7] To effectively mitigate the climate crisis and keep temperature increases within manageable ranges, the world has a limited “carbon budget.”[8] Emissions today deplete that budget and, together with investments in new sources of emissions, “lock in” future temperature increases.[9]

High-carbon and deforestation-risk retirement plan investments contribute to systemic climate risk in beneficiaries’ portfolios, endangering workers’ life savings. These investments are especially perverse when made automatically on behalf of younger workers with long investment time horizons. The Company’s climate-unsafe retirement plan may also contribute to difficulty in worker recruitment and retention, as polling indicates employee demand for responsible retirement options.[10]

Federal law requires that retirement plan fiduciaries act in beneficiaries’ best interests and ensure prudence of the plan’s investments. Recent regulatory amendments have confirmed that managing material climate risk is an appropriate consideration for retirement plan fiduciaries.[11] The Company can best ensure that it is meeting its obligations to employees — especially younger employees — by appropriately mitigating climate risk in its retirement plan investments.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Degroof Petercam Asset Management (DPAM) For
Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU. For

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.