CHEVRON CORPORATION | GRI aligned tax transparency report at CHEVRON CORPORATION

AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
Resolution details
Company ticker
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
ESG sub-theme
  • Tax
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Company sector
Company HQ country
United States
Supporting materials
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board of Directors issue a tax transparency report to shareholders, at reasonable expense and excluding confidential information, prepared in consideration of the indicators and guidelines set forth in the Global Reporting Initiative’s (GRI’s) Tax Standard.
Whereas clause
Supporting Statement
Tax transparency is increasingly important to investors. The PRI, representing investors with $89 trillion assets under management, states, “For investors, tax risk is financially material at the individual asset level. With tightening regulations and shifting societal expectations, tax avoidance activities of multinational enterprises have attracted large fines and highlighted growing reputational, governance, and earnings risks.”1 96% of US companies expect more tax disputes as governments increase scrutiny over tax avoidance. 2
In 2021, 136 countries signed a global tax reform framework.3 National and regional-level agreements also demonstrate growing consensus around the importance of tax disclosures: the proposed Disclosure of Tax Havens and Offshoring Act, passed by the House of Representatives, requires public country-bycountry reporting (CbCR) of financial (including tax) data by SEC-registered companies.4
In November 2021, the European Union approved a directive to implement public CbCR for large multinationals operating there.5 In April 2023, the Australian government released draft legislation that requires CbCR for any large multinational doing business in Australia.6 Chevron does not disclose foreign tax payments, or revenues or profits abroad with adequately disaggregated data. This challenges investors’ ability to evaluate the risks of taxation reforms, or whether Chevron’s tax practices ensure long term value creation. Tax authorities have repeatedly challenged Chevron's taxation approach, producing significant costs for the company.7 For example, in 2017, an Australian court found that Chevron used offshore entities to underpay taxes and ordered Chevron to pay
$268 million.8 Despite releasing a report on approach to tax,9 Chevron is retreating from its transparency commitments. This includes withdrawing from the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, limiting information about payments to governments.10
The GRI Standards are the world’s most utilized corporate reporting standard.11 The GRI Tax Standard is the first comprehensive global standard for public tax disclosure. It includes four components. GRI 207-1, 207-2, and 207-3 require companies to disclose their approach to tax governance, control, and risk management; stakeholder engagement; and management of tax concerns. 207-4 requires CbCR of financial information including revenues, profits and losses, and tax payments in each jurisdiction.12 GRI207 also re commends disclosing “industry-related and other taxes or payments to governments.” A GRI-compliant tax transparency report would bring Chevron in line with peer companies – including many in the oil, gas, and mining industries13 – who report using GRI 207.14 Chevron already reports CbCR information to OECD tax authorities privately, so any increased burden is negligible.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
Degroof Petercam Asset Management (DPAM) For
Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU. For
VidaCaixa For

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.