Broadcom Inc. | Climate Transition Plan and GHG Reduction Goals at Broadcom Inc.

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Set targets or plans
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • GHG targets / emissions
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that Broadcom issue near- and long-term science-based-greenhouse-gas-reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s ambition of limiting global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius and summarize plans to achieve them. The targets and plan should cover the Company’s full range of operational and supply chain emissions.
Whereas clause
WHEREAS: To limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has advised that greenhouse gas emissions must be halved by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050. Every incremental increase in
temperature above 1.5 degrees will increase physical, transition, and systemic risks for companies and investors alike. Up to 10 percent of global economic value could be lost by 2050.1
Broadcom recognizes that active environmental management makes Broadcom “more resilient to climate change while allowing [the Company] to increase operational performance and reduce costs.”2 Yet, Broadcom lacks long-term targets in line with Science-Based-Targets-initiative (SBTi) methodologies and fails to comprehensively inventory and set scope 3 emission-reduction targets. To date, Broadcom only aims to reduce Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions 38 percent by 2030. It also lacks a climate transition plan.
The Semiconductor Climate Consortium urges companies to set net-zero-emission targets and transparently report progress.3 Broadcom’s customers Apple and Cisco have set net-zero-emission-reduction targets and will consider
suppliers’ own net-zero goals as they work to eliminate upstream emissions. Peers Qualcomm and Analog Devices have set ambitious and transparent science-based targets. Both companies have Scope 1, 2, and 3 SBTi-approved targets that are 1.5 degrees Celsius aligned for FY2030 and net zero commitments by 2050.
Investors seek disclosure on how companies are addressing climate risks and opportunities through emissions-reduction targets and climate-transition plans. Such plans should detail near-term quantitative actions to achieve medium- and long-term goals.
Investors believe Broadcom must take additional action to comprehensively address its climate impact and mitigate risks, including adopting 1.5-degrees-Celsius-aligned science-based targets for its full carbon footprint and developing a climate-transition plan.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: In assessing targets, shareholders recommend,
· Taking into consideration approaches used by advisory groups like the Science-Based-Targets initiative;
· Developing a transition plan that outlines how the Company plans to achieve its goals, taking into consideration criteria used by advisory groups like the Task Force for Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, CDP, and Transition Plan Taskforce;
· Consideration of setting targets for renewable energy, supply chain engagement, and other measures deemed appropriate by management.
1 https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/topics-and-risk-dialogues/climate-and-naturalcatastrophe-risk/expertise-publication-economics-of-climate-change.html 
2 https://docs.broadcom.com/doc/environment-social-governance-report 
3 https://semi.org/en/industry-groups/semiconductor-climate-consortium 

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.