Canadian National Railway Company | Paid Sick Leave Policy at Canadian National Railway

Status
AGM passed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
CNR
Resolution ask
Adopt or amend a policy
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
  • Remuneration or pay
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
Canada
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders ask the Board of Directors to negotiate paid sick leave policies with all unions representing Canadian National Railway’s U.S. workforce. These polices should ensure that all CN employees are able to utilize paid sick leave benefits without being subject to discipline under CN’s employee attendance policies.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: One out of five people working in the United States have no access to earned sick time, or “paid sick leave”, for short-term illness, health needs and preventive care.1 They often face an impossible choice when they are sick: stay at home and risk their economic security or go to work and risk their coworkers’ and the public’s health. CN has significantly lagged all but one other Class I railroad in the amount of paid sick leave agreements it has negotiated with unions representing its U.S. workforce since the last round of national bargaining concluded.
As the COVID-19 pandemic has shown, paid sick leave is a crucial component of public health by allowing sick workers who are contagious to isolate themselves from their coworkers and the public. One study found a 56% reduction in COVID-19 cases as the result of temporary federally mandated COVID-19 paid sick leave in states that did not previously have paid sick leave.2 State and local paid sick leave laws have also been shown to reduce influenza-like illness infections without causing negative effects on employment or wages.3
Under the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, railroad employees are only entitled to sickness benefits after seven days of illness.4 Railroad employees and their unions have expressed concern that these benefits are inadequate, and that employees risk discipline if they need to take unscheduled time off due to sickness.5 Workers’ concerns about the need for paid sick leave have been exacerbated by the railroad industry’s adoption of “precision scheduled railroading” that has reduced railroad carrier staffing levels by 30 percent since 2015.6 In 2022, members of various railway unions rejected tentative agreements that did not contain employer provided paid sick leave benefits.7 According to the Association of American Railroads, a nationwide rail shutdown due to a labor dispute could cost the U.S. economy more than $2 billion a day.8
As a result of legislation passed in Canada in 2022, all of Canada’s federally regulated employees, including CN’s Canadian employees, get up to 10 days of paid sick leave a year. The implementation of this requirement in Canada has created a disparity where CN’s Canadian workforce has immediate paid sick leave, but its U.S. based workforce is only entitled to sickness benefits after seven days of illness. That disparity does not make sense from a financial or operational perspective.
We believe negotiating comprehensive and permanent paid sick leave policies with all unions representing CN’s U.S. workforce would help make the future operating environment more equitable and mitigate reputational, financial, and regulatory risk to Canadian National Railway.
1 https://www.bls.gov/ncs/ebs/benefits/2021/employee-benefits-in-the-united-states-march-2021.pdf 
2 https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00863 
3 https://voxeu.org/article/pros-and-cons-sick-pay 
4 https://rrb.gov/Benefits/UB9
5 https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/28/business/railroad-workers-strike-threat.html
6 https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/15/business/economy/railroad-workers-strike.html 
7 https://www.npr.org/2022/11/17/1136459343/railroads-rail-workers-strike-negotiations-labor-union 
8 https://www.aar.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/AAR-Rail-Shutdown-Report-September-2022.pdf

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.