Intuitive Surgical | Report on Gender and Racial Pay Gap at Intuitive Surgical

Status
AGM passed
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
ISRG
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Myra K. Young of CorpGov.net requests Intuitive Surgical, Inc (Intuitive) report annually on unadjusted median pay gaps across race and gender globally and/or by country, where appropriate, including associated policy, reputational, competitive, and operational risks, and risks related to recruiting and retaining diverse talent. The report should be prepared at reasonable cost, omitting proprietary information, litigation strategy, and legal compliance information.
Racial/gender pay gaps are the difference between non-minority and minority/male and female median earnings expressed as a percentage of non-minority/male earnings.
Supporting statement
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: An annual report adequate for investors to assess performance would integrate base, bonus and equity compensation to calculate:
percentage median gender pay gap, globally and/or by countrypercentage median racial/minority/ethnicity pay gap, U.S. and/or by country.Pay inequities persist across race and gender. They pose substantial risks to companies and society. Black workers’ median annual earnings represent 77% of white wages. Median income for women working full time is 84% of that of men.[1] Intersecting race, Black women earn 76% and Latina women 63%.[2] At the current rate, women will not reach pay equity until 2059, Black women 2130, and Latina women 2224.[3]
Citigroup estimates closing minority and gender wage gaps 20 years ago could have generated 12 trillion dollars in additional national income.[4] PwC estimates closing the gender pay gap could boost OECD economies by $2 trillion annually.[5]
Minorities represent 54.7% of Intuitive’s United States workforce and 19.8% of VP leadership. Figures for women are 37.2% and 25%, respectively.[6] Actively managing pay equity is linked to superior stock performance and return on equity.[7]
Best practice reporting includes both:
Unadjusted median pay gaps, assessing equal opportunity to high-paying roles, andStatistically adjusted gaps, assessing whether minorities and non-minorities, men and women, are paid the same for similar roles.Intuitive reports statistically adjusted gaps but ignores unadjusted gaps, which address structural bias women and minorities face regarding job opportunity and pay, particularly when men hold most higher paying jobs. While Intuitive reports diversity data, median pay gaps show, quite literally, how Intuitive assigns value to employees through the roles they inhabit and pay they receive. Median gap reporting also provides a digestible and comparable data point to determine progress over time.
Racial and gender unadjusted median pay gaps are accepted as the valid way of measuring pay inequity by the United States Census Bureau, Department of Labor, OECD, and International Labor Organization.[8] The United Kingdom and Ireland mandate disclosure of median pay gaps.
An increasing number of companies, including peers Pfizer and Thermo Fisher, disclose unadjusted gaps to address the structural bias women and minorities face regarding job opportunity and pay.[9]
Pay Equity Affirms Human Rights and Increases Long-Term Shareholder Value 
Vote FOR Racial and Gender Pay Gap Report – Proposal [4*]
[1] https://www.nationalpartnership.org/our-work/resources/economic-justice/fair-pay/americas-women-and-the-wage-gap.pdf
[2] https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/income-poverty/cps-pinc/pinc-05.html - par_textimage_24
[3] https://iwpr.org/iwpr-publications/quick-figure/the-gender-pay-gap-1985-to-2020-with-forecast-for-achieving-pay-equity-by-race-and-ethnicity/
[4]https://ir.citi.com/NvIUklHPilz14Hwd3oxqZBLMn1_XPqo5FrxsZD0x6hhil84ZxaxEuJUWmak51UHvYk75VKeHCMI%3D
[5] https://www.pwc.com/hu/en/kiadvanyok/assets/pdf/women-in-work-2021-executive-summary.pdf
[6] https://www.intuitive.com/en-us/-/media/ISI/Intuitive/Pdf/2022-intuitive-esg-report.pdf
[7] https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/people-and-organizational-performance/our-insights/promoting-gender-parity-in-the-global-workplace ; https://www.issgovernance.com/file/publications/ISS-ESG-Gender-Diversity-Linked-to-Success.pdf
 
[8]https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5bc65db67d0c9102cca54b74/t/622f4567fae4ea772ae60492/1647265128087/Racial+Gender+Pay+Scorecard+2022+-+Arjuna+Capital.pdf
[9] https://diversiq.com/which-sp-500-companies-disclose-gender-pay-equity-data/

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.