MCDONALD'S CORPORATION | Report on Risks Related to Biodiversity and Nature Loss at MCDONALD'S CORPORATION

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
MCD
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Biodiversity / nature
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that McDonald’s prepare a public report, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information, assessing the extent to which the company’s supply chains and operations impact biodiversity and are vulnerable to biodiversity loss.
Whereas clause
Biodiversity loss is a global systemic risk. Investors and governments worldwide are increasingly acting to address the impacts and dependencies of economic activity on natural systems. At the United Nations Biodiversity Conference in 2022, 190 countries agreed to take steps to prevent biodiversity loss. The resulting Global Biodiversity Framework calls on businesses to assess and disclose biodiversity dependencies, impacts and risks, and reduce negative impacts.

Failure to comprehensively assess its natural capital impacts and dependencies and ultimately mitigate them may expose McDonald’s to unnecessary risk, including:

Systemic Risk: More than half of the world’s GDP is either moderately or highly dependent on nature’s services, and the Food and Beverages industry depends on natural services for $1.4 trillion of value generation. By some estimates, tens of billions of dollars in assets could be at risk of stranding over the next five to ten years.[1]

Regulatory Risk: The recently adopted European Sustainability Reporting Standards, which apply to certain U.S. companies that do business in the EU, include mandatory reporting of biodiversity and ecosystem impacts and risks, and mandatory biodiversity reporting in line with Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosure (TNFD)[2] is under discussion in the UK.[3] The International Sustainability Standards Board is reviewing the work of the TNFD as it considers developing natured-based disclosures.[4]

Operational and Reputational Risk: Failure to adequately assess and mitigate dependencies on nature could impair the Company’s ability to procure key commodities that are at risk from nature loss and failure to mitigate the Company’s impacts on nature could harm McDonald’s family-friendly reputation.

McDonald’s has made a number of commitments to avoid and reduce key drivers of nature loss across its value chain, and is part of the TNFD Forum, collaborating with industry peers on the frameworks, metrics and tools that will be used to address nature-related risks and opportunities, yet it has not published a systematic review of its dependencies and impacts on biodiversity and natural capital. Without a comprehensive assessment of the company’s nature and biodiversity impacts, dependencies, risks, and opportunities to inform its business strategy and activities, McDonald’s may subject itself to unnecessary risk.
Supporting statement
In completing this assessment and report, proponents defer to management’s discretion but recommend considering the guidance of standard-setting bodies such as the TNFD and Science Based Targets for Nature.[5]

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.