THE WENDY'S COMPANY | Worker Driven Social Responsibility Impact Report at THE WENDY'S COMPANY.

Status
Filed
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
NASDAQ: WEN
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Decent work
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
RESOLVED: Shareholders request The Wendy?s Company ("Wendy?s") publish a report evaluating how implementing worker-driven social responsibility (WSR) principles and supporting binding agreements would impact Wendy's ability to identify and remediate human rights issues in sourcing produce.
Supporting statement
RESOLVED: Shareholders request The Wendy?s Company ("Wendy?s") publish a report evaluating how implementing worker-driven social responsibility (WSR) principles and supporting binding agreements would impact Wendy's ability to identify and remediate human rights issues in sourcing produce. WHEREAS: Many corporations have developed corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs in response to heightened scrutiny over exploitative and unsafe conditions in global supply chains. However, evidence demonstrates that CSR approaches often fail to identify or remedy persistent rights abuses such as wage theft, health and safety violations, and gender-based violence.1 Reports of modern-day slavery and perilous conditions continue to emerge, including among suppliers certified by ethical sourcing certification schemes frequently used in CSR approaches. For example, an investigation of berry and tomato farms in Mexico certified by Fair Trade USA and Equitable Food Initiative found evidence of rampant human rights violations, as well as indicators of forced labor.2 Agricultural operations, including in the US, present a high risk of human rights abuses and expose companies like Wendy?s to increased risks of operational disruptions, legal liability, and reputational harm.3 Wendy?s has been silent on whether or not it sources - through its reported supplier, Mastronardi - from growers subject to an October 2021 import ban by Customs and Border Protection due to forced labor.4 In 2021, 95% of Wendy?s shareholders overwhelmingly supported a resolution calling on Wendy?s to specifically disclose how it protects workers in its supply chain from human rights violations.5 In response, Wendy?s released a report in December 2021, which Investor Advocates for Social Justice reviewed and concluded did not meaningfully respond to the shareholder concerns and reaffirmed that Wendy?s continued to disregard human rights in its food supply chain.6 The Company?s Code of Conduct for Suppliers indicates suppliers? employees should report grievances directly to the supplier, raising the risk of retaliation.7 WSR principles were developed to protect workers? rights, in response to the failures of CSR approaches.8 Recognized as the gold standard for human rights enforcement programs,9 WSR initiatives are led by workers, include binding agreements between workers and brands, and ensure independent monitoring. They also support timely and effective reporting of harms through grievance mechanisms and worker participation in the design and provision of remedy.10 Companies incorporating WSR may benefit from improved employer-employee and buyer- supplier relationships, better data on program effectiveness within the supply chain, and quicker identification and resolution of human rights risks in the supply chain.11 Unlike many of Wendy's peers - who have taken steps to improve conditions for workers and remediate rights violations by employing WSR approaches such as the Fair Food Program - Wendy's has failed to implement WSR approaches.12 The requested WSR evaluation would better position Wendy?s to understand gaps in its efforts to mitigate legal, reputational, and human rights risks in its supply chain. 1 https://www.msi-integrity.org/not-fit-for-purpose/; https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/357989/worker- driven-social-responsibility-corporate-ethics-consumers 2 https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5810dda3e3df28ce37b58357/t/65380365b86b180f057f6c20/1698169 715394/Certified+Exploitation+Oct+2023.pdf 3 https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/whd/whd20230202-2; https://www.axios.com/pro/retail- deals/2024/08/16/forced-labor-agriculture-food-retail-supply-chain 4 https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/national-media-release/cbp-issues-withhold-release-order-tomatoes- produced-farm-mexico; https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-12-31/u-s-blocks-tomato-shipments- from-mexican-farms-accused-of-abusing-workers 5 https://www.iccr.org/shareholders-calling-human-rights-protections-essential-food-chain-workers-prevail- wendys-annual/ 6  https://ciw-online.org/wp-content/uploads/20220308-Shareable-Digital-FFP-Advisory-and-Appendix-1.pdf 7 https://www.wendys.com/sites/default/files/2018- 04/2017%20Wendy%27s%20Supplier%20Code%20of%20Conduct_FINAL.pdf 8 https://wsr-network.org/what-is-wsr/statement-of-principles 9 https://www.msi-integrity.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/MSI_INSIGHT_1.FINAL_FORWEBSITE.pdf 10 https://fairfoodprogram.org/; https://electronicswatch.org/new-worker-driven-remedy- principles_2635094.pdf 11 https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-and-human-rights-journal/article/overlooked- advantages-of-the-independent-monitoring-and-complaint-investigation-system-in-the-workerdriven-social- responsibility-model-in-us-agriculture/B2FA243E5ACD6F4CBEBCDF0C500BFC4A 12 https://fairfoodprogram.org/partners/

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.