Holcim AG | Advisory vote on the climate report
How other organisations have declared their voting intentions
Organisation name | Declared voting intentions | Rationale |
---|---|---|
Ircantec | Abstain | We are voting to abstain from voting on Holcim, despite its notable efforts in recent years to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and its ambitions for carbon neutrality by 2050. Indeed, Holcim is gradually integrating climate into its strategy, with a substantial CAPEX plan, a continuous reduction in absolute global emissions, a trajectory validated by SBTi at 1.5°C by 2050 with a reference year in 2020 across all Scopes. In addition, the short-term targets (2030) are also validated at 1.5°C for Scopes 1 and 2. However, the company is heavily basing its carbon neutrality strategy on carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies, which represent 44% of its emission reduction levers for Scopes 1 and 2. This technological dependence raises questions about the maturity and future reliability of these technologies. Furthermore, Holcim lacks specific interim targets, particularly for 2040, and the Scope 3 objectives are not fully quantified, leaving uncertainties about the emissions reduction trajectory. CAPEX investments, while substantial, are mostly focused on CCS technologies to the detriment of clean energy and decarbonization. Finally, climate governance, while present, does not appear to provide sufficient incentives in the long term to pursue a more effective climate policy. Consequently, although Holcim shows signs of commitment, its climate plan requires adjustments to be considered truly robust and sustainable in the long term. |
DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.
Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.
Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.