Badger Meter, inc. | Solutions for Increasing Diversity on Board of Directors at Badger Meter, Inc.

Status
85.35% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
BMI:US
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Governance
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Industrials
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Resolved: Shareholders request that the Board of Directors report to shareholders within six months of the annual meeting, at reasonable expense excluding confidential information, on whether and how the company intends to put new, specific action steps in place for increasing board diversity.
Whereas clause
Whereas: In Corporate America, the value of diversifying boards is gaining traction, though improvement remains slow. According to a Spencer Stuart report, "[j]ust under one of four new S&P 500 directors (23%) are minorities (defined as African American/Black, Asian, and Hispanic/Latino)";

Further, the Harvard Business Review (HBR) explains that "[t]he underrepresentation of Black professionals is especially bleak in the highest echelon of corporate America: boards of directors. Although newly-appointed directors are increasingly diverse, 37% of the S&P 500 firms did not have any Black board members in 2019 and Black directors comprised just 4.1% of Russell 3000 board members that same year";

Badger Meter's board of directors currently appears to have two women but zero people of color;

In response to shareholder engagement, in 2017 the Company committed to "seeking out highly qualified women and minority candidates as well as candidates with diverse backgrounds, skills and experiences as part of each Board search the Company undertakes." Since then, the Company has elected new board members, including one woman but none who are racially/ethnically diverse. The Proponent is unaware of any disclosure on whether the Company has fulfilled its commitment to include women and people of color in each board search and believes that additional steps much be taken to address the issue of persistently low levels of diversity on our Company's board of directors;

To diagnose the economy-wide problem of board diversity, an HBR survey found barriers for diversifying the board in: director recruitments strategies, limited diversity in personal connections of existing board members, ineffective onboarding practices, lack of leadership roles for existing Black board members, and racial discrimination in board dynamics;

When discussing solutions, the HBR article explains the value of increasing board diversity, such as a broadening of the diversity of perspectives and concerns among board members, greater likelihood of prioritizing diversity within the company, and enhanced morale and confidence of diverse employees;

The Proponent belies that examining the causes of the lack of racial and ethnic diversity on the board and committing to concrete steps to diversity the board of directors would serve the long-term value of shareholders and the company.
Supporting statement
Supporting Statement: The proponent suggests that among the strategies the company could explore include, at board and management discretion, are: board member diversity quotas, engaging a search firm for each board search, requiring at least two candidates of color in each candidate pool, considering a board refreshment policy, examining the potential limits to increase in diversity from using current board member networks for recruitment, and other strategies that balance candidate qualifications and diversity.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
KBI Global Investors For The company lags industry peers with no racially/ethnically diverse directors.
Pathfinder Asset Management For Increased disclosure on board diversity efforts would benefit shareholders
Boston Trust Walden For

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.