Foot Locker, Inc. | Disclosure on Plans and Policies Aligned with Achieving Racial Equality as Informed by As You Sow Scorecard at Foot Locker, Inc.

Status
Withdrawn
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Resolution details
Company ticker
FL:US
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Consumer Discretionary
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Foot Locker publish a report at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information disclosing the Companys plan if any to promote racial justice.
Whereas clause
In the wake of the George Floyd murder by police officers on May 25, 2020 a majority of Russell 1000 corporations made public statements expressing their plans to address racial justice, thereby taking the first step to becoming antiracist organizations. Antiracism is the practice of identifying, challenging, and changing the values, structures, and behaviors perpetuating systemic racism. Foot Locker issued a statement on its website, supporting racial justice and elimination of systemic racism. The statement provides a generalized overview of Foot Locker's plans to further this effort. While the Company's USD200 million donation to further racial equity is commendable, shareholders need to see material change within organizational policies and practices.

Numerous studies cite material corporate benefits associated with adopting corporate policies promoting racial justice:
- A McKinsey study shows companies with the strongest racial and ethnic diversity are 35% more likely to outperform their industry medians
- Companies with the most ethnically/culturally diverse boards worldwide are 43% more likely to experience higher profits
- For every 10% increase in racial and ethnic diversity among senior executives, EBIT rises 0.8%

However, inequities in the workplace continue:
- People of Color comprise 33% of entry level positions, but only 13% of the C-suite
- Among companies in the Russell 3000, Black individuals accounted for only 4.1% of board members versus 13.4% of the U.S. population
- "Failure to adopt inclusion practices translates into a loss of customers and reduces profitability"

Foot Locker can play a critical role in ending systemic racism by promoting racial justice.

The need for action is underscored by Foot Locker's 19% score on a recent Racial Justice Scorecard. This score is significantly below peer, Nike, which scored 56%. Foot Locker's low score is due to its lack of publicly accessible diversity and inclusion targets and disclosed data concerning hiring, retention, and promotion rates of people of color within the Company. Given heightened awareness around racism, failing to act and disclose policies and quantifiable data raises the material risk of revenue loss and reduced brand value.
Supporting statement
Investors seek quantitative, comparable data to understand if and how the Company is promoting a commitment to Racial Justice. Proponents suggest the report include:
- Potential policies the company could adopt to promote Racial Justice in its corporate workplaces and operations
- Detailed quantitative information on diversity and inclusion, including recruitment, hiring, and retention policies and outcomes

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.