CHEVRON CORPORATION | Report on impacts of Net Zero 2050 scenario

Status
47.80% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
5
Resolution details
Company ticker
CVX
Lead filer
Resolution ask
Conduct due diligence, audit or risk/impact assessment
ESG theme
  • Environment
ESG sub-theme
  • Net Zero / Paris aligned
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Energy
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Chevron's Board of Directors issue an audited report to shareholders on whether and how a significant reduction in fossil fuel demand, envisioned in the IEA Net Zero 2050 scenario, would affect its financial position and underlying assumptions. The Board should summarize its findings to shareholders by January 31, 2022, and the report should be completed at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information.
Whereas clause
As evidence of the severe impacts from climate change mounts, policy makers, companies, and financial bodies are increasingly focused on the economic impacts from driving greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to well-below 2 degrees Celsius below pre-industrial levels (including 1.5 degrees C ambitions), as outlined in the Paris Agreement.

This focus has led many Chevron peers (including BP, Eni, Equinor, Repsol, Royal Dutch Shell, and Total) to commit to major GHG reductions, including setting "net zero emission" goals by 2050.

Investors are also calling for high-emitting companies to test their financial assumptions and resiliency against substantial reduced-demand climate scenarios, and to provide investors insights about the potential impact on their financial statements.

As of December 2020, Chevron Corporation had neither committed to net-zero emissions by 2050 across its value chain, nor disclosed how its financial assumptions would change from doing so.

In contrast, the audit reports for other high GHG-emitting companies clearly discussed this connection:

BP: how climate change and a global energy transition impacted the capitalization of exploration and appraisal costs and risks that oil and gas price assumptions could lead to financial misstatements;
Shell: how long-term price assumptions impacted by climate change could affect asset values and impairment estimates;
National Grid: noted estimates inconsistent with 2050 "net zero" commitments.
Additionally, in 2020, BP, Shell and Total reviewed their 2019 financial accounting practices in light of the accelerating low-carbon energy transition. All three subsequently adjusted critical accounting assumptions, resulting in material impairments, and disclosed how climate change affected the adjustments.

In October 2020, the International Energy Agency (IEA) issued a new "Net Zero 2050" scenario which describes what it would mean for the energy sector globally to reach net-zero GHG emissions by 2050. This more aggressive global action to curtail climate change is consistent with a 1.5 degrees C temperature increase globally.
Supporting statement
Proponents recommend that in issuing the report, the company take account of information on:

Assumptions, costs, estimates, and valuations that may be materially impacted; and
The potential for widespread adoption of net-zero goals by governments and peers.
Proponents recommend that the report be supported by reasonable assurance from an independent auditor.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
CoreCommodity Management, LLC For
Dana Investment Advisors (Delisted) For
Boston Trust Walden For
Universities Superannuation Scheme - USS For We would welcome enhanced reporting of climate related risks.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.