BIOGEN INC. | Gender Pay Gap at BIOGEN INC.

Status
22.97% votes in favour
AGM date
Previous AGM date
Proposal number
6
Resolution details
Company ticker
BIIB
Resolution ask
Report on or disclose
ESG theme
  • Social
ESG sub-theme
  • Diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI)
  • Remuneration or pay
Type of vote
Shareholder proposal
Filer type
Shareholder
Company sector
Health Care
Company HQ country
United States
Resolved clause
Shareholders request that Biogen publish annually, quantitative data assessing Biogen's gender pay gap, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information. A report adequate for investors to assess company strategy and performance, including relative opportunities for women to attain higher paying positions in the company, would include the percentage mean and median pay gap between all male and female employees, across race and ethnicity where appropriate, and would include base, bonus and equity compensation.
Whereas clause
The 2017 U.S. Census data on median earnings for full-time, year-round workers found that women made 80 percent of that of their male counterparts. The gap for African America and Latina women is 60 percent and 55 percent. At the current rate, women will not reach pay parity until 2059.

Mercer finds actively managing pay equity "is associated with higher current female representation at the professional through executive levels and a faster trajectory to improved representation." Research from Morgan Stanley, McKinsey, and Robeco Samsuggests more gender diverse leadership leads to superior stock price performance and return on equity. McKinsey states, "the business case for the advancement and promotion of women is compelling." Best practices include "tracking and eliminating gender pay gaps."

Assessing if a company has a gender pay gap requires analyzing both equal pay and equal opportunity. This is most commonly done using adjusted and unadjusted (median) pay data. Median pay data is the key metric used by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the World Economic Forum, and the U.S Department of Labor, among others.

Since 2018, the UK has mandated disclosure of both adjusted and unadjusted (median) gender pay data, demonstrating that the publication of such data is feasible and informative. Biogen UK provides an annual gender pay report that reports mean and median gender pay gap and bonus gap, and pay quartiles. The Biogen UK 2019-2020 gender pay gap report states that it had a sixteen percent mean and eight percent median hourly wage gap, and a twenty-eight percent mean and twenty-five percent median bonus pay gap.

Biogen does not report on the gender pay gap for its U.S. employees.

Investors seek quantitative, comparable data to understand the effectiveness of Biogen U.S. pay gap policies.

Regulatory risks associated with pay equity exist. The Paycheck Fairness Act, pending in Congress, would improve company-level transparency and strengthen penalties for equal pay violations. Massachusetts, California, New York and Maryland have enacted significant changes to their equal pay laws.

Companies would be well served by understanding the equity attributes of their pay, at all levels of the corporation, by gender as well as other facets of diversity, such as race and ethnicity. Leading large-cap companies across industry sectors including Apple, Starbucks and Bank of New York Mellon, among others, have publicly committed to pay equity and published the results of gender pay assessments.

How other organisations have declared their voting intentions

Organisation name Declared voting intentions Rationale
LocalTapiola Asset Management Ltd For We promote additional information allowing shareholders to better measure the progress of the company's diversity and inclusion initiatives.
Kutxabank Gestion SGIIC SAU. For
VidaCaixa For
Universities Superannuation Scheme - USS For USS would support additional information on the Company's diversity policies and practices.

DISCLAIMER: By including a shareholder resolution or management proposal in this database, neither the PRI nor the sponsor of the resolution or proposal is seeking authority to act as proxy for any shareholder; shareholders should vote their proxies in accordance with their own policies and requirements.

Any voting recommendations set forth in the descriptions of the resolutions and management proposals included in this database are made by the sponsors of those resolutions and proposals, and do not represent the views of the PRI.

Information on the shareholder resolutions, management proposals and votes in this database have been obtained from sources that are believed to be reliable, but the PRI does not represent that it is accurate, complete, or up-to-date, including information relating to resolutions and management proposals, other signatories’ vote pre-declarations (including voting rationales), or the current status of a resolution or proposal. You should consult companies’ proxy statements for complete information on all matters to be voted on at a meeting.